tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14072474.post2766617024775577828..comments2023-11-03T06:36:27.305-04:00Comments on Phronesisaical: Classified!helmuthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09069600766378586919noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14072474.post-46273408161146968492013-11-25T04:21:56.262-05:002013-11-25T04:21:56.262-05:00free classified websites list
http://freeclassifie...free classified websites list<br />http://freeclassified.net16.net/<br />http://freeclassified.site50.net/<br />http://localclassified.comuf.com/<br /><br />http://moneytricksonline.net63.net/<br />http://moneytricksonline.site90.net/kabeerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15912736678926777837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14072474.post-54268271001221215402010-12-17T12:47:50.526-05:002010-12-17T12:47:50.526-05:00MT,
There are three classification levels which a...MT,<br /><br />There are three classification levels which are Top Secret, Secret and Confidential. They are ostensibly used to delineate the level of harm to the US should the information be disclosed. Although there is guidance, there is still some latitude on where something should fall. Secret is by far the largest and most-used level.<br /><br />There is also "SCI" which compartmentalizes information, usually based on source. Additionally, there are a host of caveats, releasability tags, and declassification codes added onto the end of a classification.<br /><br />In short, it can get very complicated, especially when since the classification system has changed several times in the last twenty years.<br /><br />One additional thing. Information can be classified because the nature of the information itself or it can be classified because of it's source. It's frequently the case that information that appears to be obviously unclassified is actually classified because of the source. For instance, a leader of another country telling his/her defense minister to meet for coffee does not seem classified, but if the method used to obtain that involved eavesdropping on a foreign encrypted communication system, then you can, and should, expect that to be highly classified despite its banality. A lot of the wikileaks diplomatic documents were classified for that reason - it's not so much what was said, but who said it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14072474.post-1282855305228362162010-12-17T05:15:38.168-05:002010-12-17T05:15:38.168-05:00"is to have a class designation" I mean ..."is to have a class designation" I mean (not the "top secret" designation in particular, being presumably just the topmost of many).MThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02341704109256270557noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14072474.post-54736485686336945732010-12-17T05:11:22.212-05:002010-12-17T05:11:22.212-05:00You used to hear "classified top secret"...You used to hear "classified top secret" and see "Top Secret" rubber stamped on documents and folders in the movies. To me that meant "top secret" was the class of document, and that to be "classified" was to have that designation. Also it meant that the movies in which the labels on the folders read "Classified Top Secret" were lame.MThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02341704109256270557noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14072474.post-56368399903197572002010-12-16T19:17:07.036-05:002010-12-16T19:17:07.036-05:00Thanks.Journalists and others are throwing the ter...Thanks.Journalists and others are throwing the term around a great deal and I realized I had no idea what it meant. The Assange trial may enlighten us all.troutskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16020298501632120830noreply@blogger.com