Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Bye to the "idealism"

I always thought it was a toupee anyway.
While President Bush vows to transform Iraq into a beacon of democracy in the Middle East, his administration has been scaling back funding for the main organizations trying to carry out his vision by building democratic institutions such as political parties and civil society groups.

The administration has included limited new money for traditional democracy promotion in budget requests to Congress. Some organizations face funding cutoffs this month, while others struggle to stretch resources through the summer. The shortfall threatens projects that teach Iraqis how to create and sustain political parties, think tanks, human rights groups, independent media outlets, trade unions and other elements of democratic society.

The shift in funding priorities comes as security costs are eating up an enormous share of U.S. funds for Iraq and the administration has already ratcheted back ambitions for reconstructing the country's battered infrastructure. While acknowledging that they are investing less in party-building and other such activities, administration officials argue that bringing more order and helping Iraqis run effective ministries contribute to democracy as well.

Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House, an advocacy group that hosted a Bush speech last week, called the situation "a travesty" and said she is "appalled" that more is not being done. "This is the time to show that democracy promotion is more than holding an election. If the U.S. can't see fit to fund follow-up democracy promotion at this time," then it is making a mistake, she said.

2 comments:

troutsky said...

I dont have any evidence that this is the case but I suspect "democratic capacity building" for the folks down at NED is basic neo-liberal capitalism building thinly disguised. That is at least the case in places in Latin America, eastern europe, where they operate.

helmut said...

I'm pretty sure that's the case too. I've been saying all along that the Iraq War, for example, is about liberalization, not democratization. Democracy in Iraq gives you theocracy. As incompetent as the administration is, they had to have known that. They can at least add, after all, can't they?