SINCE the release of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed’s dramatic confessions, moral outrage at the extent of his crimes has been mixed with doubts. Can his claims be trusted? What if he confessed to more than he really did, either because of a vain desire to be remembered as the big terrorist mastermind, or because he was ready to confess anything in order to stop the water boarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques”?
If there was one surprising aspect to this situation it has less to do with the confessions themselves than with the fact that for the first time in a great many years, torture was normalized — presented as something acceptable. The ethical consequences of it should worry us all.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
Zizek in the NYT
Sounds like our Phriendly Phrancophile, no? I think maybe Slavoj has been reading Phronesisaical . . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment