Excellent point: I did indeed mean Bill Richardson, and not another Bill Richardson. That would have been the wrong Bill Richardson--not to mention one Bill Richardson too many.
(You know, if all this ends up being actually valuable PR, there's really only one thing to do: Bill Richardson.)
3 comments:
In fact just the other day I was thinking...Bill Richardson.
What? You mean, Bill Richardson?
Excellent point: I did indeed mean Bill Richardson, and not another Bill Richardson. That would have been the wrong Bill Richardson--not to mention one Bill Richardson too many.
(You know, if all this ends up being actually valuable PR, there's really only one thing to do: Bill Richardson.)
Post a Comment