The fact remains that there was a clear choice about the invasion. One was supported by strong evidence, rational argument, reasonable conjecture, and - especially in hindsight, although they were well-informed at the time - accurate predictions. Combined with a reasonable prudence, demanded morally by any deliberations over war, all signs pointed away from an invasion as morally and politically sound policy. All of this went unheeded. The other version, supporting the invasion, was a fog of anger, propaganda, willful ignorance, wishful thinking, misinformation, bald deceit, petro-greed, and that curious Cold War legacy in Washington of perceiving the world as a gameboard in which the Middle East is prime property on which to place your tokens.
There are plenty of places to go to refresh the memory on the pre-war days, but I want to draw your attention to one in particular, Tony Karon's piece "Iraq, an American 'Nakbah'".

Also worth a look is Spencer Ackerman's piece here.
No comments:
Post a Comment