Having read only the abstract of the paper, I can't say if all fuck is included in the analysis. But it does seem to discuss the general properties of fuck, such that particular instances or conceptions of fuck may be included under the aegis of the universal concept of fuck.
3 comments:
If it had been written by one of your students instead of by an Ohio St. prof, would you have given it a fuckin' A?
Does the paper extend its analysis to all fuck?
Having read only the abstract of the paper, I can't say if all fuck is included in the analysis. But it does seem to discuss the general properties of fuck, such that particular instances or conceptions of fuck may be included under the aegis of the universal concept of fuck.
Post a Comment